Need Websites?

We, QuickBizTech have 8 Years of Exp in Web development in PHP and hosting. Skills: Photoshop, Designing, Core PHP, MySql, Joomla, Wordpress, Drupal, Magento, phpBB, Opencart, Smarty, Google API, JQuery, Charts, oAuth, SEO, Payment Gateways.


Please contact us for any kind of websites to be developed, upgraded, migrated. Reach our team for your dream website @QuickBizTech

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Separate law against honour killings sought

A UNFPA study on gender laws has recommended a separate law against honour killings to ensure that khap panchayats and families victimizing couples are brought to book. The move has been supported by Planning Commission member Sayeeda Hameed who said it should be made an election issue.

The UNFPA report — 'Laws and Son Preference in India: A Reality Check' — has evaluated gender laws to find that legislations meant to protect women may be doing the opposite. Authored by senior advocate Kirti Singh, the report also recommended a new anti-discrimination legal framework to guide laws and policies for women and girls.


The study found that some legal provisions were not just inadequate in checking son preference, but also promoted the practice and ended up being discriminatory for women, such as the Goa law on polygamy that permits second marriage for the husband where there is no son from the first marriage. The study strongly recommended removing such blatantly discriminatory provisions.

"A deeply entrenched preference for sons exists for various reasons including that a son inherits property, whereas a daughter is perceived as more of a burden due to factors such as dowry — a practice that continues to prevail despite being illegal. Laws and their implementation are the backbone of social change. They hold the potential to change mindsets and stem generations of gender discrimination,'' Frederika Meijer, UNFPA representative for India and Bhutan, said.

Advocating a strong law against honour killings, author Kirti Singh said, "Violent, abusive, barbaric acts occur even before killing. There is no law to address this. It is urgently required."

Agreeing to this, Hameed said, "This should be made an election issue. There has to be a separate law to address honour killings."

One in 10 people could suffer from diabetes by 2035

A shocking new report suggests that one in 10 people globally will have diabetes by 2035.

To highlight World Diabetes Day which takes place each year on Nov. 14, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) released its sixth edition of the Diabetes Atlas.

The report estimates how many adults between the ages of 20 to 79 will be affected by the disease in the future.

By the end of this year, the IDF estimates that 382 million people will have diabetes around the world, CBS News reported.

By 2035, that number will skyrocket to 592 million. For comparison, about 285 million people had the disease just four years ago.

Eighty percent of people with the disease live in low- and middle-income countries, and most of them are between 40 and 59 years old.

The organization also said that one person dies from diabetes every six seconds, or about 5.1 million deaths annually.

The IDF estimates that the percentage of U.S. residents affected by diabetes will increase to 11.6 by 2035, which will be 29.7 million people.

About 8.3 percent of the U.S. population had a form of diabetes in 2011, according to the American Diabetes Association.

Minor fire in store room of Satish Dhawan Space Centre

A minor fire, which broke out in the store room at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, some 100 km from here, has been doused off, sources said today.

The "minor fire" in a small store room, which was spotted around 5 AM yesterday was put out later, ISRO sources said.

The store room was being managed by a private company PremierExplosives Limited (PEL) in the SDSC campus, they said.

The blaze has not caused any damage to the ISRO property.

"There is no injury to anyone. The things in the store room mainly electrical and electronic equipment belonged to the private company," an ISRO official said.

Tagged Amur Falcons tracked to Arabian Sea

The three Amur Falcons marked Naga, Pangti and Wokha, and tagged with satellite tracking devices this month in Wokha district of the State have reached the Arabian Sea. The current locations, signalled by the trackers which the birds are wearing, show that their journey has been safe and uneventful.

Naga and Pangti have reached the Arabian waters, while Wokha is behind its two companions, the satellite feed showed. On November 7, the three birds were among many that were tagged with tracking devices by scientists who landed at Doyang in Wokha district to study the estimated one million Amur Falcons that had roosted in the area during their annual migration to South Africa.

The first three birds were named after the Naga people, Pangti village and Wokha district. Naga is a male, while Wokha and Pangti are females. The three aerial predators were fitted on their backs with tiny tracking devices carrying antennae and solar panels. The satellite tag weighs only 5 gram.

The birds’ migration is being tracked through satellite linked to a website in Hungary. Every detail of the movement of the birds will be known through the devices, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Lokeswar Rao said in a press release today.

This is for the first time that Amur Falcons were tagged with satellite devices and released, thereby putting Nagaland on the international map with regard to conservation.

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Sachin Tendulkar had illustrious contemporaries in Ricky Ponting, Brian Lara, Jacques Kallis and others. Yet, he had an aura all his own. Arunabha Sengupta analyses the records of these legends to find out what made Tendulkar stand out among the very best of batsmen.


The modern generation has been lucky enough to witness several great batsmen rule over the twenty two yards with their peerless willows.

Ricky PontingBrian LaraRahul DravidJacques Kallis — the names are many and monumental. And striding amidst them with an undeniable difference is Sachin Tendulkar.

Indeed Tendulkar has a special place even among all these batting giants. Throughout his 24 year career, he enjoyed a following unmatched in the history of cricket and very seldom witnessed in any other sport.

Cricket following in India is about as far from exact science as possible. The media, perceptions and the lure of the immediate play huge roles in the way heroes are made and villains are branded, sometimes in complete contrast to abilities and performance.

However, is Tendulkar’s endless appeal merely an Indian frenzy? Why is it that in spite of the many peerless batsmen of the era, Sachin Tendulkar is marked as the best of the generation by a majority of the former greats — from Ricky Ponting to Shane Warne, from Graeme Pollock to Sunil Gavaskar?

Listed below is an analysis of the modern age and an attempt to determine what makes Tendulkar stand out among them.


The ICC Rankings analysed

Tendulkar first shot to No1 in the ICC Rankings in November 1994. Through most of the 1990s, he shared the top spot with Brian Lara. Apart from brief spans, he ruled the batting charts till August 2002.

Especially during the period between 1996-2002, Tendulkar ruled the batting world with more runs at a far better average than anyone else in the world. As can be seen from the table, the rival to the batting throne, Brian Lara, was going through a slump during this period.


The era of Tendulkar magnificence — 1996 to 2002 (top run-getters)

BatsmanMRunsAve100s50s
SR Tendulkar (India)625,92261.052221
R Dravid (India)645,33554.431327
SR Waugh (Aus)644,59849.441616
AJ Stewart (Eng)694,51641.43824
G Kirsten (SA)634,40642.771318
BC Lara (WI)574,37543.751120


And while he dropped a few places due to his tennis-elbow related slump, he managed another dream run from 2007 and regained the top spot in October 2010, managing to remain there until early days of 2011. Apart from the loss of form during the 2005-2006 period he remained at the very top or extremely close.


The period between the first day Tendulkar topped the rankings to the last day he enjoyed as No 1 amounted to 17 years.

This is a very revealing indicator of the great man’s accomplishment and one of the reasons why he is widely rated as next only to Bradman, although statistically there are batsmen with higher averages.

Among all the batsmen in history, only Jack HobbsDon Bradman and Garry Sobers have enjoyed such a huge period at the top.

Brian Lara too topped the charts first in 1994, and for the last time in 2005. But his form was far more volatile, reaching dazzling zeniths of batting royalty and spending the punctuating periods scratching for runs in the plebeian planes. Much of the 1996 to 2000 period for the left-handed great was rather ordinary.

When ICC Rankings are computed for the heroes of the past, we see Sunil Gavaskar enjoying a much shorter peak between 1978 and 1981. Viv Richards, in contrast, had a longer run, peaking for the first time in 1976 and for the last time in 1988.

To put things in perspective, we find Ricky Ponting ruling the world between 2002 and 2006, Rahul Dravid hovering near the top during the same period. Jacques Kallis has topped periodically between 2004 to 2006 and was very near the top in 2011-12.

But, none of the modern greats can match Tendulkar in this one aspect – prolonged sojourn at the summit of batsmanship.

That is one of the reasons why Tendulkar appeals to a relative old-timer from the early 1990s as well as to the modern day follower of the game.


The career graphs

If we look in some detail at the figures of the modern day batsmen who have amassed mountains of runs at gargantuan averages, the story told by the ICC Rankings is underlined yet again.

Below, we have carried out a systematic study of how the careers of the best batsmen of the modern era progressed with by computing their progressive ten-Test match averages. We have traced their running current form (average for the past 10 Tests), from the tenth Test they played to the very last of their careers.

The graphs below trace the careers of the batsmen Test match by Test match, and the path traversed by each batsman is placed alongside Sachin Tendulkar to compare and contrast. The horizontal axis denotes the number Test matches played.  The vertical axis shows the current form at the time of playing that Test — the corresponding batting average of the last 10 Tests.

The first graph shows us Tendulkar’s batting career pictorially, how his numbers progressed from the point of view of a ten Test moving average. The shaded area in each graph denotes the zone of greatness, batting average crossing into the high fifties and beyond.  We find that he had his first peak in the period 1996-2002, and the second during 2007-2011, with one major trough due to his tennis-elbow problems in 2005-2006.

Tendulkar’s career graph – how his batting form varied over time

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Next, we place the batting graphs of major contemporary batsmen next to Tendulkar’s batting graph in order to find out the differences between the maestro with the others.

We only consider the batsmen whose careers are over or drawing to an end, and whose playing period more or less overlapped with a major part of Tendulkar’s days.

As we can see in the subsequent graphs greatness has touched each and every one of them, sometimes stayed with them for a while, and sometimes deserted them cruelly. Some have started early and some have taken time to mature.

The pairwise batting charts will also tell us that while most batsmen have had sudden short peaks into greatness followed by periods of hovering between the very good and mediocre. Tendulkar, Kallis, Ponting stand out even in this exclusive group with the longevity of their supreme form — a sure signature of enduring greatness.

And even among these three, Sachin Tendulkar spent longer at the summit than the other two. He slipped for a period with his injuries, but clawed back to recover his place at the very top yet again.

The comparatively greater amount of time Tendulkar has spent in this zone is evident from the charts and is incredible in retrospect.

Career scoring patterns (how ‘last 10 Test batting average’ has varied over time for Tendulkar and his contemporaries)

Tendulkar and Ponting

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

We can see that after some initial peaks Tendulkar peaked into the zone of greatness and remained there for a huge stretch of time (1996-2002) and again re-emerged among the greats in the latter part of his career (2007-2011).

From 2001-2006 Ponting enjoyed a tremendous peak and looked likely to outscore Tendulkar in the long run if he managed to continue in the same vein. However, it is well known that his form fell away in his last 50 or so Tests.

Tendulkar and Kallis

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Kallis took a while to come into the zone of consistent greatness. However, once he got there in 2001, the stint as a great batsman has been phenomenal. He has been settled there but for a couple of small dips in form. If he can rectify the recent run of poor scores, he can yet match the trail of consistency blazed by Tendulkar.

Tendulkar and Lara
 

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

This comparison is a story of sustained brilliance against alternating periods of sublime greatness and surprising mediocrity. While most of Tendulkar’s career remained in the zone of greatness, Lara slipped into the realm of the less gifted for a rather large period of time while shooting back into the zone towards the final third of his career. Here too we see that Tendulkar scores much higher in terms of longevity.

Tendulkar and Dravid

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

During a mid-career high of nearly 50 Tests from 2001 to 2006, Dravid remained ensconced as a genuine great. However a prolonged trough from 2006 to 2009 did not help his cause as his average plummeted from 58 to the early 50s. He did have a short foray in that zone during the England tour of 2011, but it was too small a rise to be considered a re-entry.

Tendulkar and Sangakkara

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Kumar Sangakkara remained hovering on the fringes of greatness, sometimes sipping back into the always classy very good category when he was still keeping wickets. However, giving up the bigger gloves and a supreme 2006-2008 thoroughly established him among the greats and he has remained there ever since. If he continues along the same lines for a couple of more years, he can be considered to be a genuine rival of Tendulkar for consistency over time in the realms of greatness.

Tendulkar and Mohammad Yousuf
What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Mohammad Yousuf necessitates comparison by virtue of being contemporary to Tendulkar and because of his high batting average. However, as is evident from the comparative graph, his numbers depend heavily on two short peaks. He did not have a sustained run to challenge the longevity of Tendulkar at the summit.

Tendulkar and Younis Khan
What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats

Like Mohammad Yousuf, Younis Khan also has excellent figures, but his career has been comparatively shorter. His small sequence of peaks were not really comparable in terms of longevity to Tendulkar.

Tendulkar and Chanderpaul

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats


Shivnarine Chanderpaul took a while to find his feet, which he did after an operation of his foot that removed a floating bone. Since then there have been almost sinusoidal crests and troughs, with the crests often being exceptional. With time the periods in the prolific zone are getting longer. However, this is largely erratic in contrast to Tendulkar’s sustained brilliance.

Tendulkar and Hayden

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats


Matthew Hayden is yet another example of one major peak followed by normal oscillations between highs and lows. Even here we witness the difference the sustained period of greatness of Tendulkar and the much briefer stint of Hayden.

Tendulkar and Steve Waugh

What makes Sachin Tendulkar different from the other modern greats


In the case of Steve Waugh again we see one solitary major high in the numbers followed by above average performances encroaching on to the brilliance zone, and a clear trough before ending on a brief high. Waugh was consistent, and very good most often, but did not enjoy a sustained stint in the zone as Tendulkar.


Conclusion

The graphical charts analysing the greatest performers with the bat underline that one aspect of Tendulkar’s career that makes him special beyond compare. Very few have approached a similar stint at the very top for such a prolonged period of undisputed greatness.

The main differentiator remains undeniable. What the others achieved at the very peaks of their careers was the story of Tendulkar’s entire journey bar the last two years. And then there was some additional magic above and beyond it.

Punit is my inspiration in 'Gori Tere Pyaar Mein': Imran

Bollywood actor Imran Khan has said that director Punit Malhotra was his source of inspiration for his character in the forthcoming movie ‘Gori Tere Pyaar Mein’.

"I`m playing a Casanova in the movie and Punit is my source of inspiration. He used to come shirtless, get a massage done on the sets, joked around with the crew and lots more," Imran said on a TV show.

"I did exactly what he does always. In fact, it seemed like I was living his life," he added.

In the film, which releases Nov 22, Imran essays a south Indian boy named Sriram. Actress Kareena Kapoor, who will be seen as a social worker Dia, will be seen as his love interest. The movie also features Shraddha Kapoor in a guest appearance.

I get nervous with Shah Rukh Khan; Salman Khan makes me comfortable: Katrina Kaif

Meanwhile, her co-star from Dhoom 3 Aamir Khan, feels the trailer of the film should be a selling point of the film.


Katrina Kaif

Actress Katrina Kaif says she gets nervous in front of superstar Shah Rukh Khan while ex-beau Salman Khan makes her feel comfortable.

"I was nervous while working with Shah Rukh... I don't know why. There was something about him that made me nervous.. while Salman makes me feel comfortable... he has known me since beginning. Personality wise, I give Salman ten on ten," Katrina said yesterday during an interaction at the 'Dhoom 3' title song launch here.

Katrina has worked with SRK in late filmmaker Yash Chopra's last movie 'Jab Tak Hai Jaan' while with Salman she has been paired quite a number of times including in 'Maine Pyaar Kyun Kiya', 'Yuvvraj', 'Partner', and blockbuster 'Ek Tha Tiger'. The two Khans have not been on good terms since their fight at her birthday bash in 2008.

Meanwhile, her co-star from 'Dhoom 3' Aamir Khan, feels the trailer of the film should be a selling point of the film.

"We won't go to all TV shows to promote our film. It is not necessary to promote the film on TV. We will market our film but in a right way," Aamir said.

There were reports that Aamir is involved in the editing of the film, which he denied.

"I did gave suggestions for the film but it was not taken. I have no hand in editing the film," he added.

Recently, Hrithik Roshan had said that he would be happy if 'Dhoom 3' breaks the box office record of 'Krrish 3'.

To which the 48-year-old actor said, "I don't believe in records... I don't look at records. We all want audience to enjoy, love our film."

Screen exclusive: Hrithik Roshan on 'Krrish 3' success, gearing up for 'Krrish 4'

With a score of Rs. 206.35 crore (within 10 days) and counting, 'Krrish3' has proved that superheroes (in Hindi cinema) are here to stay! Man of the moment, Hrithik Roshan gets candid on this much cherished triumph, why merely wearing a cape and a mask does not do the trick, the next edition of Krrish and more

A superhero film is a great way to educate and motivate our children and not have them feel weak because of their weaknesses.
To play superhero role, an actor has to be a superhero fan. I am a fan of all of them and fairly nspired by the fact that all superheroes are about their super weaknesses. And so you need an actor who has been able to accept his weakness and
overcome it

Considering Krrish is such a rage among children, how did your sons Hrehaan and Hridaan respond to the film's third edition?

They loved it. I am just glad that in their range of superheroes there is a Krrish involved now in fighting with Spider-man, Super-man, Iron man and apparently, Krrishna wins! They were very curious while the film was being made, and they kept asking what was going to happen; which was good because they were really involved. And it's the greatest joy, because if your own kids and family don't like the film then well, it's not satisfying enough. As much as you get from the outside, you need that tank to be filled up first by the people you love so much.

And did it live up to your own expectations?

Well, the facts and figures are there to prove that it has gone way beyond any expectations. I could have expected the world, but I still would have been shocked by the way it's doing right now.
I think by the end of the first week we'd cross Rs.200 crore ( worldwide). What else can one ask for? The kind of acceptance and love that is pouring in from all over, it reaffirms your belief that as much as you put into something, that's how much you will get back. So my belief, that I am on the right track and that I must continue have been reaffirmed. I must always take this as a blessing. I am very fortunate that I can add so much joy to the lives of so many people. When I visited the theaters, I saw that euphoria and it was such a huge compliment; a pat on my back that I have done well. And to be able to put a smile on someone's face just by being there is a blessing. I will never take that for granted.

Were you disappointed that the reviews were not entirely flattering?

On the contrary, we have had an average of 4 or 4.5 stars. I have never had a more critically acclaimed film in my entire life. Even Koi Mil Gaya didn't have so many stars. All the papers, except Mid-day have given an average of 4-4.5 stars. To add to that is the success of the film, so this is in every way my biggest hit.

So what do you think worked in the film's favour?

We have added so much variety, which I think people have never seen in their lives in a film. It's the vision that has worked. You can point a lot of flaws in the film, and I would sit with you and join that charade but what actually works is the essence of the vision. That vision has gone through the eye of the needle. The message has come across and people have imbibed it. They have understood it. The nitty-gritties of how good some things were, or how bad some things were, are all points which you could listen to, to think of various possibilities for the next time. But on the whole it is still the biggest success ever so we definitely have pushed our cinema; we have evolved in every single way. This definitely is path breaking.
My father started with me in 2000 with Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai, then he made Koi Mil Gaya, Krrishand Krrish 3 —four back- to- back historical hits. I am really happy that he took on such a challenge when he started with this film, because we had to put our remuneration on the line to make this film. It was such a fantastic idea that instead of being pushed, we were pulled towards it. The universe supports evolution. Right from the day when we were apes, it's all about evolving, so if you are trying to evolve your cinema, and trying to push the barriers to find out what is the extent of your ability then the universe supports you. And that's what has happened. The universe has supported us because we chose to go where no one else dared to go. And there is so much variety in this film—mutants, Kaal, Kaya and everyone has done a great job. There is of course Krrish, Rohit and the emotions are there. I think that's what films are about. We have instilled the essence of being a superhero. I have heard kids in the theater say, "Mama, even I can be a superhero because all I have to do is help someone and then I am a superhero. So, the message has come through, and that's what has worked for the film.

Was taking the concept forward as a sequel, a part of the original plan right since the inception of Koi Mil Gaya?

Not at all. It was something really organic. Koi Mil Gaya was a film that stood by itself. But in my head, the thought that dad would get a brainwave that would take the film further always lurked. When he did, it just sounded absolutely right. At that time we were thinking of some other films but nothing was working out. I remember he offered me some eight scripts after KMG and none of them worked. And then he came up with this one and I just jumped at it. And because of the success of Krrish it manifested into Krrish 3, and because of the success of Krrish 3 we are going to see Krrish 4 sooner than we think.

A common critique of the idea of bringing the superhero to our movies is that Hindi film heroes, in any case, have superpowers. So was there a challenge in making this acceptable?

It's a challenge for us, because when you see Hindi films, all our heroes are already superheroes, so our superhero has to be bigger, better and needs to be more overpowering than the hero. The costume and the mask could even end up looking rather funny and people could actually laugh at it, because our heroes even as regular folks have superpowers in the films, so the challenge is even greater for Krrish. It really is about creating that world with those powers, the fantasy, the sci-fi world and then the challenge is that when he fights, he can't fight like a normal hero. The fights, the stunts have to have an edge. There has to be something fantastic in every single thing that he does. Yeah, so it really goes beyond our conventional superhero.

Okay, so what distinguishes the hero from the superhero? Is it just the costume or that he is saving the world as opposed to just settling personal scores?

A superhero is someone who is there in service to the world. But really, it goes much beyond. With a superhero, the differentiation between super-strengths and super-weaknesses are very, apparent in the films, so it's a good way to teach our children that it is your super weaknesses that actually fuel your super-strengths. Because for every Spider-man there is a Peter Parker who has a vacuum in his life; who is a have-not or who does not succeed as Peter Parker, but he finds the strength inside him to be a Spider-man. He uses the strength in service of the world and that's what sets him apart and makes him a superhero. A superhero film is a great way to educate and motivate our children and not have them feel weak because of their weaknesses.

There is also a feeling that our superhero films lack novelty as they borrow heavily from Hollywood flicks. Given the success of Krrish 3, do you think an Indian palette will evolve over time?

Every single time an actor cries you can't say— 'he's got tears in his eyes and even he's got tears in his eyes.' It's such a lethargic view point. If you are looking for comparisons, you can compare this chair (points to a chair in the room) to every single chair you have seen in your life. And say, 'What's new about this chair? It's got four legs, a backrest, two arms'. But there is something individual about each piece. We all look the same, we have two eyes a nose and ears and a mouth, and yet we are individuals; so you have to look at that one quality that the film is talking about. I can give you ten thousand things that are same in Thor..., Iron man and I can go across the spectrum and compare every single Hollywood film to each other and show you about the 30-40 thousand punches which are alike. But that doesn't mean they are all the same. I think it is the stimulus that matters. What is stimulating, that punch that action? If emotion and the content that is stimulating is the same then you can say, yeah it's a rip-off, or a copy. But if the catalysts or that one content factor is different, then those comparisons don't hold water.

How do we compare with international productions?

I think you should compare us to whatever... Go ahead compare it to Man of Steel. We have come to that stage where we don't need to shy away and say, we are an Indian film. All the VFX films that you have seen has been done in India. This is the first film where people have started comparing it to the West, and more than 90 per cent have given us a thumbs-up which just goes to show our competence. And we have done all this at two per cent of the cost or actually just one percent in a film budget of say Rs.100 crore, which is not even the remuneration of an actor in the West. It's the kind of budgets they have and the time they can afford is massive. So if we can do this in two per cent of the cost (of a Hollywood production), anything is possible. Now it's going to go through the roof. The scope is going to inspire film-makers, stoke their imagination, because now they know it's possible here and they don't have to look to the West or anywhere else. I think Indian films are on the brink of evolving at a breakneck speed now.

First an alien (Koi Mil Gaya) and now mutants—what made you introduce them in this edition?

Adding mutants was a very good idea and it also added a lot of excitement for the children. We felt that just a villain is not enough. Let's build it even more. Let's make it even harder for Krrish. Let there be levels in the action sequences which differ from each other. When you fight with a mutant, your action has to be completely different. When you are fighting with Kaal it's something else. Adding more variety to the action, would also make it look more interesting; for instance, fighting with the frogman's tongue or with Kaaya with her powers.

What's been the learning on this film?

I have learnt that it's important to focus on something that your heart completely resonates with—dad spent three years with it! You have to believe in it no matter how difficult it seems. If you can see the vision in your head and keep going forward, you will see that light of day, you will see victory. I say this because Krrish 3 started as one of the scariest things we would ever do. I remember dad shelving this film because it was too risky, too costly. Now, it makes me realise that the universe will support you if you are truly moving ahead with courage and power and total belief in what you do. I think life is about being enthusiastic about what you are doing. The greatest success about Krrish is not even the success, I think the greatest success is the three years, where each day was spent in pure enthusiasm about what we were doing. And that co-relates with the saying that it's the journey that matters and not the destination. So our victory was already achieved. We were enthusiastic during the journey and the destination was reached automatically, so it's been a victory even before the victory.

Are there any specific qualities that an actor needs to be able to pull off a superhero film?

To play a superhero role, an actor has to be a superhero fan. I am a fan of all of them and fairly inspired by the fact that all superheroes are about their super weaknesses. And so you need an actor who has been able to accept his weakness and overpower and overcome them to identify with that character because you can't really fake it. You have to really have had to experience it. That's true for any role not just the superhero, but what really sets a superhero apart is the body language. From the costume, to the mask to the way he stands, I think the aesthetics are the most important aspect of getting the superhero right. What I said earlier is for every character, but for a superhero, the body language is of supreme importance. It should be consistent and identifiable even from a mile away. If he's walking, you should know it's Spider-man Iron Man or Krrishna. The way he flies, the way he jumps or lands, it should all be identifiable. It can't just be anything, so Krrish has his own style of taking the leap or his own style of flying.

There were some visual moments that felt almost mythological — such as Krrishna towering over everything with a chakra like motion in the backdrop—was that a conscious move to sort of Indianise the content for the audience to connect with?

We went with it because Rohit prayed to Krishna and Jaadu came as an avatar of Krishna, because he was blue. So we just took all that and named Rohit's son Krrishna. And then there's a scene where he has to tell the girl he saved, his name. She asks him 'who are you?' And he's about to say Krrishna when he remembers the promise that he gave his daadi that he would not disclose his identity. He begins to say Krrish and stops at that, and it sticks. So we called him Krrish.

When can we expect the next edition? And what are your other films that are coming up? Is there a sabbatical on the cards?

There's going to be no sabbatical. I think, we will see the next Krrish sooner than people think or even what we think. It will probably be very different. Maybe we can make it even more human...actually I am just thinking aloud.

My next film is Bang Bang and we are starting on the 27th of this month, so I'd better get ready for my next journey. Hopefully, by then my head would have stopped hurting. It still hurts, so I am giving that as much time as I can for repair and Shuddhi starts almost simultaneously because of the disruption of my dates due to the surgery. I am planning to put both the films on floor so that I complete however much I can in the shortest span of time. It's also a complete action film.

Controversy over 'Ram-Leela' most upsetting: Girish Karnad

Writer-director-actor Girish Karnad today slammed the controversy and protests surrounding Sanjay Leela Bhansali's film 'Ram-Leela', saying it was "nonsensical".

"That is really most upsetting. It is impossible to be creative if some idiot gets up and says 'I am sad'. Judiciary should also have some sense. The decision is nonsensical," Karnad, who was in the city to deliver 26th Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial IFFCO Lecture, said.

Bhansali's film, which released today, is facing the ire of several groups for allegedly hurting religious sentiments.

The film, starring Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone, has

been dragged to different courts over its title and content.

Some political groups today tried to stop the screening of the

movie in Delhi, Rajkot and Indore.

Bhansali was also forced to change certain words in the Gujarat-set film after some members of the Rajput community expressed displeasure.

MP High Court had yesterday asked that the words 'Ram-Leela' be removed from the film's title following a plea that its use had hurt religious sentiments.

Controversy over the film's title has seen the same being

changed, first from 'Ramleela' to 'Ram-Leela', and then to 'Goliyon Ki Rasleela: Ram-Leela'.

Delhi High Court recently recalled its restraining order against the film's release.

Google Reunion ad goes viral on the web, wishes to bridge the gap between India and Pak

Google has struck the right emotional chords with its latest advertisement ‘Reunion’ that does bring back the very hurtful memories of the India-Pakistan partition, but makes people in both countries hopeful about meeting their loved ones from across the border. Even though it broaches the emotionally touchy subject, it still manages to bring a smile to the face of each and every person who watches it.

The video essentially shows the advantages of Google Search, but has a story to tell. It starts with Mr. Mehra showing his granddaughter Suman an old picture with his childhood friend Yusuf. He tells her stories of Lahore where he and his best friend lived and played together. Once Suman gets some details she decides to track Yusuf down by Googling them and ends up locating her grandfather’s friend via Google+.

On the other side of the border, we see Yusuf’s grandson looking for visa requirements for India in Google and checking the weather conditions of Delhi while packing bags. And at last, both grandchildren manage to bring their grandfathers together, with the help of Google search, of course.

Even though the company’s main objective was to highlight the advantages of their products and vast connectivity, it chose a topic that is bound to touch the hearts of every person from the two countries. And going by the number of views the video has garnered within two days, it has been successful. When we last checked, it had 2,140,348 views.

Do watch the video, if you haven’t already and share your views about it with us.

Turbulence is here to stay, says Indra Nooyi

‘’One needs to accept the fact that turbulence is here to stay. New challenges call for new ideas. We have to change our approach to business during turbulent times,” PepsiCo chairperson & CEO Indra Nooyi said while speaking at the CII National Council Meeting in Mumbai.

After announcing her plans to invest R33,000 crore in India by 2020, Nooyi said India remains a fundamentally strong story with the large reservoir of untapped potential.

‘’I believe Indian business is an emerging force with 200 million internet users. During tough times corporates need to reinvent themselves constantly. I think turbulence brings opportunities for growth,” she said.

Speaking on the theme ‘Managing uncertainty-leadership in turbulent times’, Nooyi said, “During turbulent times, leaders need to handle the situation with courage and conviction. We took a bold step of shifting our global positioning from ‘fun’ products to ‘good for you products’, and it worked well for us... And we clinched selective acquisitions during turbulent times.”

According to Nooyi, most successful companies are those that stay calm and think down to earth rather than showing aggressiveness to shorten the crisis period. “Modern CEOs should have a clear focus on long-term investments,”she said.

Nooyi strongly believes companies can not deliver value unless they anchor the company’s values.

“Values make an unsinkable ship. Code of conduct goes beyond legal compliance and every employee needs to be well versed with it,” said Nooyi.

India currently represents one of PepsiCo’s largest markets globally. The Rs 33,000 crore investment is expected to further strengthen and expand PepsiCo’s capabilities in the next few years.PepsiCo and rival Coca-Cola are vying for a bigger chunk of developing countries’ business as growth rates in Asia, the West Asia and Africa are four to five times those in the US and Europe.

Nooyi strongly believes that emerging markets play key role in growth of global companies. “During turbulent times, PepsiCo looked at new markets including India," she added.

Legends like Tata, Sachin don’t retire, says FM

Legends like Ratan Tata and Sachin Tendulkar don't retire, said Union finance minister. "They just move on to doing different things," said P Chidambaram while comparing the industrialist to the batting legend at an event where the minister felicitated Tata with the CIIPresident award.

The finance minister said that he admires Tata for his frugal lifestyle, for being a person of few words and creating wealth for millions. "Being a politician and lawyer, I can only envy. I admire him for his passions and that he can look back and say he has fulfilled his passions," Chidambaram said, adding that there is a lesson for all industry groups to take from what he has established.

Tata said that his association with CII dates back to the days of Tarun Das, who had led the industry body for 30 years. The chairman emeritus of the Tata Group recalled that how the late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had appreciated CII's role in transforming the country. Recalling his desire of not wanting to be taken out of Bombay House —the Tata Group's HQ—in a coffin, he said "I fulfilled the criteria and walked out in my position."

"It's been an exciting time for India," said Tata in his speech, exuding optimism about theeconomy even though growth has slowed down. Later, PepsiCo's global CEO Indra Nooyi said that "turbulence is the beginning of a fruitful process of transformation". Nooyi added that companies should stay calm and think long during crisis.

JPMorgan Chase to pay $4.5 billion in mortgage security deal

JPMorgan Chase & Co said on Friday it has agreed to pay USD 4.5 billion to settle claims by investors who lost money on mortgage-backed securities before the collapse of the U.S. housing market.

The bank reached the agreement with 21 institutional investors in 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by JPMorgan and Bear Stearns, which it took over during the financial crisis, according to the bank and lawyers for the investors.

The deal still has to be accepted by seven trustees overseeing the securities holdings, the parties said.

The settlement does not include trusts issued by Washington Mutual, which JPMorgan also acquired.

The deal is separate from the preliminary USD 13 billion settlement JPMorgan has reached with the U.S. government that would resolve a raft of actions over mortgage-backed securities.

"This settlement is another important step in J.P. Morgan's efforts to resolve legacy related RMBS matters," the bank said in a statement. The bank said it believes reserves it has built will cover the expense of "this and any remaining" mortgage securities litigation.

The 21 investors include BlackRock Inc, Metlife Inc(MET.N), Allianz SE's Pacific Investment Management Company(ALVG.DE), the TCW Group and Bayerische Landesbank.

Under the agreement, trustees have until January 15 to accept the offer, which may be extended for another 60 days, according to JPMorgan and Gibbs & Bruns, the Houston law firm that represented the institutional investors.

Kathy Patrick of Gibbs & Bruns called the deal "an important milestone" in a three-year effort by the group of 21 bondholders.

The seven trustees over the bonds include Bank of New York Mellon Corp(BK.N). Kevin Heine, a spokesman for the Bank of New York Mellon, said the bank would "evaluate the proposed settlement along with the other trustees."

If accepted, the deal would resolve claims that JPMorgan and Bear Stearns misrepresented the mortgages underlying the securities, JPMorgan said.

The settlement also would resolve servicing claims on all trusts issued by the bank and Bear Stearns between 2005 and 2008.

JPMorgan is the third bank to strike a deal with investors over shoddy mortgage-backed securities issued in the run-up to the financial crisis.

Bank of America Corp struck an USD 8.5 billion settlement in June 2011 with 22 institutional investors. That deal is still awaiting court approval.

In 2012, bondholders in trusts issued by Ally Financial's bankrupt former mortgage lending arm, Residential Capital, won an agreement to bring an USD 8.7 billion claim, although that was later reduced to USD 7.3 billion.

Gibbs & Bruns has represented investors in all three settlements. In 2011, the law firm said its investor clients had instructed trustees overseeing USD 95 billion of securities issued by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual to investigate whether the bonds were backed by ineligible mortgages.

Washington Mutual is not included in the deal because of ongoing litigation between the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and JPMorgan over who is responsible for losses at the former mortgage lender, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The separate tentative USD 13 billion settlement between JPMorgan and the U.S. government also has been complicated by that dispute, according to other sources.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has vowed to resolve legal and regulatory issues that have been weighing heavily on the company since May 2012.

In October, JPMorgan reported its first quarterly loss under Dimon as it recorded more than USD 9 billion of expenses to build its litigation reserves.

JPMorgan is the biggest U.S. bank by assets.

Pakistan: 7 Killed in Sectarian Clash

Shiites traveling in a religious procession near Pakistan’s capital on Friday killed seven Sunnis from an Islamic seminary for insulting them as they passed, the police said. Thirty-two other people were wounded in the clash in Rawalpindi, said a hospital official, Mohammad Qasim. The Shiites dragged the Sunnis out of the seminary after hearing the shouted insults and killed them, said a police officer, Afzal Hussain. They also set several shops outside the seminary on fire, he said. 

The police tried to stop the clash, but officers were wounded as the two sides threw stones at each other, Mr. Hussain said. An army unit based in Rawalpindi, which is near the capital, Islamabad, eventually reached the scene and took control. The Shiites were observing Ashura, which commemorates the seventh-century death of the Prophet Muhammad’s grandson. The schism between Sunnis and Shiites dates to that time. The holiday has been marred by violence in Pakistan in past years, including bombings of Shiite processions.

Sri Lanka needs to go 'faster' on rights: Cameron

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron urged Sri Lanka on Saturday to move "further and faster" to address allegations of war crimes, saying the issue would remain high on the international agenda.
"The Sri Lankan government needs to go further and faster on human rights and reconciliation," Cameron told a press conference at an ongoing Commonwealth summit in Colombo.

"I accept it takes time but I think the important thing is to get on the right track," added Cameron who paid an historic visit on Friday to the island's war-torn north.

"This issue is not going to go away, it's an issue of international concern."

The UN and rights group say as many as 40,000 civilians may have been killed in the final stages of the civil war in May 2009.

However Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse has denied any civilian was killed.

He has also blocked all calls for an independent probe into claims of war crimes committed by government forces against the Tamil population in the northern Jaffna region.

Cameron said Rajapakse wanted more time to address the claims but put him on notice to deliver by March or else he would push for an international investigation through the auspices of the UN human rights council.

"I sense that they do want to make progress on these issues and it will help having international pressure to help make that matter," said Cameron.

Asked about his meeting on Friday night with Rajapakse, Cameron said "very strong views were expressed on both sides".

"It was a very frank and clear meeting, a frank exchange of views.... Of course not everything I said was accepted."

China eases its one-child policy

China announced Friday that it would ease its deeply unpopular one-child policy, a high-profile move by new leaders to limit a program that has prevented millions of births but helped create an aging population that could constrict economic growth.


The decision to allow couples to have a second baby if either is an only child is part of a reform package that includes abolishing the much-criticized "re-education through labor" program, which allows people to be sent to labor camps for up to four years without trial.

The Communist Party also promised to respect property rights and reduce confiscation of land, a major grievance for farmers, who have largely missed out on the real estate boom that has made many urban Chinese rich.

The reforms were enacted at a four-day plenum of the Communist Party's Central Committee last week and announced on the evening news — China's most widely watched television program — an indication of the importance the leadership attaches to them.

The measures are among the first major policy moves by the new leadership under Xi Jinping, who became head of the Communist Party late last year and president in March. All of the reforms had been under discussion for years, but they were stalled during Hu Jintao's presidency, which many China watchers refer to as a decade of paralysis.

Xi has been eager to prove himself a more forceful and decisive president.

The change in the one-child policy is likely to have the most immediate effect on Chinese families. Demographers have estimated that such a change would allow about 10 million couples to have a second child. The current law allows only couples in which both are only children to have a second baby.

Since the one-child law was introduced in 1980, Communist Party officials have tweaked it repeatedly, allowing myriad exceptions — for minorities, for rural families without boys, for people with disabled children. But there have been few major amendments of this kind.

The party said it would adhere to the principle of limiting family size while promoting the "long-term balanced development of the population of China."

China's National Health and Family Planning Commission says the law has reined in the country's population growth, preventing 400 million births. China's population is 1.3 billion.

Demographers say the impact of the law on population growth has been exaggerated and that it instead has led to a gender imbalance, with more boys than girls born. Furthermore, they say, the low birthrate is beginning to impair China's economic growth, creating a population with too many old people and too few workers.

According to the 2010 census, China's fertility rate was 1.18 children per woman, far below the level needed for the population to replenish itself.

"In the 1980s, when the one-child policy was implemented, it was needed to stop the rapid population growth and increase per-capita income," said Zhou Haiwang, an expert in population studies at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.

"Now, 30 years later, it has achieved that goal. Now it is time to increase the fertility rate to benefit our society in the long term," Zhou said.

The policy, a bedrock of the Communist Party's social engineering, has been deeply unpopular. In the 1980s, female factory workers had to show family planning officials their stained sanitary napkins to record their menstruation.

"We called them the 'period police.' They wanted to make sure you weren't pregnant," said Lijia Zhang, a Beijing-based writer and social commentator. "At the time, we didn't think it was intrusive. It was just the way things were in China."

Although enforcement has eased, family planning officials are still frequently accused of forcing women to undergo abortions, often late in pregnancy, or to be sterilized against their will.

Meanwhile, rich families have been able to skirt the one-child law by going abroad to give birth or paying large fines. Reports this year said film director Zhang Yimou had fathered seven children.

Another popular reform among human rights advocates is the abolition of the laojiao system, which allows petty offenders to be sent to labor camps without trial. It has often been used to punish whistle-blowers and people who file complaints against government officials.

The system, set up in the 1950s to punish counterrevolutionaries, has been the subject of much criticism in recent years. In 2009, a United Nations report estimated that 190,000 people were serving time in Chinese labor camps without having gone to trial.

In a disappointment to liberals, the plenum offered few other hints of political reform or a loosening of censorship. To the contrary, Xi pledged to step up monitoring of social media, a major source of news for many younger Chinese.

The leadership had hyped the meeting in advance as an opportunity for the most significant rethinking of China's model since Deng Xiaoping's reforms of the late 1970s. An announcement earlier this week disappointed economists and financial markets who were looking for indications China would loosen the grip of large state-owned enterprises.

The announcement Friday added to the financial reforms.

Among them are opening the banking sector by allowing "qualified private capital" to set up small and medum-size banks, and for state-owned enterprises to share more of their profits. It also calls for the protection of private property.

"One cannot be deprived of property," the document says.

As for U.S. concerns over exchange rates, the document refers to improving market mechanisms but doesn't give specifics.

"I think there is going to continue to be progress, but the question is how much and how quickly," U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Friday after meeting with Xi and Chinese finance officials during a visit to Beijing. "The direction is significant, but the character and the pace of change matters."

Philippine typhoon survivors begin to rebuild

Survivors began rebuilding homes destroyed by one of the world's most powerful typhoons and emergency supplies flowed into ravaged Philippine islands, as the United Nations more than doubled its estimate of people made homeless to nearly two million.

But the aid effort was still so patchy that bodies lay uncollected as rescuers tried to evacuate stricken communities on Saturday, more than a week after Typhoon Haiyan killed thousands with tree-snapping winds and tsunami-like waves.

After long delays, hundreds of international aid workers set up makeshift hospitals and trucked in supplies, while helicopters from a U.S. aircraft carrier ferried medicine and water to remote, battered areas where some families have gone without food and clean water for days.

"We are very, very worried about millions of children," U.N. Children's Fund spokesman Marixie Mercado told reporters in Geneva.

A U.N. official said in a guarded compliment many countries had come forward to help.

"The response from the international community has not been overwhelming compared to the magnitude of the disaster, but it has been very generous so far," Jens Laerke of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs told the Geneva news briefing.

Captain Victoriano Sambale, a military doctor who for the past week has treated patients in a room strewn with dirt and debris in Tacloban, which bore the brunt of the storm, said there had been a change in the pace in the response.

"I can see the international support coming here," he said.

But he is still overwhelmed. "Day one we treated 600-plus patients. Day two we had 700-plus patients. Day three we lost our count."

President Benigno Aquino, caught off guard by the scale of the disaster, is scheduled to visit typhoon-affected areas on Saturday. He has been criticized for the slow pace of aid distribution and unclear estimates of casualties, especially in Tacloban, capital of hardest-hit Leyte province.

A notice board in Tacloban City Hall estimated the deaths at 4,000 on Friday, up from 2,000 a day before, in that town alone. Hours later, Tacloban mayor Alfred Romualdez apologized and said the toll was for the whole central Philippines.

The toll, written on a whiteboard, is compiled by officials who started burying bodies in a mass grave on Thursday.

Romualdez said some people may have been swept out to sea and their bodies lost after a tsunami-like wall of seawater slammed into coastal areas. One neighborhood with a population of between 10,000 and 12,000 was now deserted, he said.

The City Hall toll was the first public acknowledgement that the number of fatalities would likely far exceed an estimate given this week by Aquino, who said lives lost would be closer to 2,000 or 2,500.

Official confirmed deaths nationwide rose by more than 1,200 to 3,621 on Friday. "I hope it will not rise anymore. I hope that is the final number," said Eduardo del Rosario, director of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council. "If it rises, it will probably be very slight."

U.S. HELICOPTERS AID RELIEF EFFORT

But massive logistical problems remain. Injured survivors waited in long lines under searing sun for treatment. Local authorities reported shortages of body bags, gasoline and staff to collect the dead.

"Bodies are still lying on the roads. But now at least they're in sections with Department of Health body-bags," Ian Norton, chief of a team of Australian aid workers, told Reuters.

The number of people made homeless by the storm rose to 1.9 million, up from 900,000, the U.N.'s humanitarian agency said. In Tacloban alone, at least 56,000 people face unsanitary conditions, according to the U.N.'s migration agency.

Stunned survivors in Tacloban said the toll could be many thousands.

"There are a lot of dead people on the street in our neighborhood, by the trash," said Aiza Umpacan, a 27-year-old resident of San Jose, one of the worst-hit neighborhoods.

"There are still a lot of streets that were not visited by the disaster-relief operations. They are just going through the highways, not the inner streets," he said. "The smell is getting worse, and we actually have neighbors who have been brought to hospital because they are getting sick."

Across the city, survivors have begun to rebuild. The sounds of hammers ring out. Men gather in groups to fix motorbikes or drag debris off splintered homes and wrecked streets. Most have given up searching for lost loved ones.

The preliminary number of missing as of Friday, according to the Red Cross, rose to 25,000 from 22,000 a day earlier. That could include people who have since been located, it said.

The nuclear-powered USS George Washington aircraft carrier and accompanying ships arrived off eastern Samar province on Thursday evening, carrying 5,000 crew and more than 80 aircraft.

U.S. sailors have brought food and water ashore in Tacloban and the town of Guiuan, whose airport was a U.S. naval air base in World War Two. The carrier is moored near where U.S. General Douglas MacArthur's force landed on October 20, 1944, in one of the biggest Allied victories.

Acting U.S. Ambassador Brian Goldbeck, the chargé d'affaires at the U.S. Embassy in Manila, said the United States had moved 174,000 kg (383,000 lb) of emergency supplies into affected areas and evacuated nearly 3,000 people.

More: http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/11/16/us-philippines-typhoon-idINBRE9A603Q20131116